Ramping It Up: Children w disabilities, opinions, books

Falling off the blogosphere: And Gastrostomy insertion

I seem to have fallen off the blogosphere recently for no very good reason, although it includes an overdeveloped sense of guilt. Am struggling with the fact I have a work meeting this morning that means I'll leave from home, so have decided that the 20 minutes before 9 am can be used for "me", but no more.

Miz Morganise finally had her gastrostomy/ PEG insertion two weeks ago today. As always, it took considerably hustling and being a pain-in-the-arse to the hospital, all of which paid off. Whiel being determindedly "Lovely", I kept calling to see if they'd scheduled the operation, as I knew she'd been categorised as urgent in late November, but there'd been a hiaitus over Christmas. So by presenting myself as persistent but friendly, and ever so slightly implacable, meant that when other people cancelled, we got a last-minute "how about next week" call.

So, to recap: a gastrostomy is a tube and "button" that goes directly into the stomach and means M can be administered food or fluids more easily. We'd spent six months putting a naso-gastric tube down every morning, to give her water, as her "delayed swallow" and low strength means that ordinary water moves too fast in her mouth, with a risk of aspiration, and drinking thickened water is a slow process. This way, she was properly hydrated - happier - and a bit stronger. But sticking an NG tube down your child's throat is no fun. It's also not as hideously hard as it sounds either, or not with a child as easy going and low-tone as Miz M, but it's no picnic. It makes my nostrils twitch just thinking about it.

So the PEG will be a great long-term solution, although again any visit to the Children's Hospital, with a General Anaesthetic and post-operative pain is a bit of a trial. And the fasting, with a wee girl who simply cannot understand why she's not being fed: aaargh! And then in finding the right position for the PEG, they had to have two gos, so there was an extra puncture mark, and they had to hold off feeding her for another 24 hours. Thirty six hours without food and drink, when you're not quite three, don't know what's going on, and have pain in your tummy from an op . . . had me reaching for all the platitudes. If only I could take the pain and deal with it myself. If only I could somehow transfer and absorb it.

Then again, as always, the Children's hospital is an extended exercise in being grateful, lucky, and sobered by events. The baby screaming in the middle of the night. The pre-raphaelite beauty in the next bed, only 11 years old, with a mystery infection that had her pale and limp, but with a raging tempreature, and a whole "barrage of tests" as they say. And very nice parents, who'd spent a week livng and sleepign by her side. Luckily, it was sorted while I was there.

So M came home with her new PEG, but with a long tube attached, which'll be replaced in 3 months time with the permanent, discreet version. Meanwhile, ther's a rosette of plastic and a 30 cm tube poking out from just under her ribs, requiring ingenuity and the sewing of buttons and loops of elastic to her clothes. And just when Clancy had worked out how to sit and roll on top of her like a puppy, without biting, in a way that made her laugh with pleasure. So now we're having to keep them apart in case he pulls at the tube, which worries me in terms of the message we're giving both of them. But hey, it'll all be fine.

The odd thing about the hospital visit though, was the combination of being bored and distracted that happens. I took along the Peter Carey novel, Parrot and Olivier in America, which I know I'll just love. It seems to be a bit more like Illywacker in style, which is my fave of his. But no, I couldn't immerse myself in it as machines beeped etc. So just in case, I took along my cheapo, lolly-pink, portable DVD player I'd bought in the hope of doing more yoga and boxing workouts in the shed (which I've managed about 5 times so far, but here's hoping), and a set of the HBO series "True Blood" that I'd been given for Christmas. Well. My oh my. Funny and clever and just the ticket, although sitting by your sleeping child's bedside holding her hand while watching an erotic and explicit, blood filled scene of vampire sex, when a nurse comes up behind you to ask some question or other that I missed because of earphones, is a bit bizarre.

Oh look, four minutes to go before I switch to conscienscious mode, so what else: still reading Hilary Mantel's Place of Greater Safety on the French Revolution, which I'm loving but is taking me forever; read 2/3 of Mary Beard's Don's Life (in book form, not the blog) last night, and was completely engaged; just loved Colm McCann's Let the Great World Spin, but perhaps I already mentioned that.

And am also in a dilemma about an elderly neighbour who I've befriended and/or adopted. She's Italian, and her English is very bad. She's desparately lonely, so I was happy to invite her in and chat to her, and in some ways she's pretty easy going. But she's started to come around every day, and it's a bit exhausting. Even more, she frames her life entirely in terms of hardship, negativity, work and thigns being difficult. I'm not suggesting it hasn't been tough, but the answer to everything is "ver hard, work very hard", not just about herself but about me. If I say what I've done, she'll say, "Oooh, it's so hard for Mama", and I simply cannot and will not frame my life as a negative grind or a tragedy. So I worry that it's just the lefty soft part of me that's doing this, and wonder whether I'd be quite as forgiving if she was an old Anglo woman. Am I being suckered into the Romance of the Migrant Story? But there are also things I quite like about it, and I'm more than happy to explain why the letter she got from the govt is ok, and doesn't mean she's in trouble, to pick up things for her, to give her a glass of wine on the lounge. But I'm goign to ask some Italian speaking friends for some words to throw into the conversation, to try to explain why I need to be strong, resilient, positive, happy. I tried to ask her yesterday when she'd been most happy in her life, what made her happy, and she just said, "I no ounderstand", and I don't think it was just the language. A reminder, instead, about the different way lives are lived and understood.

Ooops, two minutes past 9, the guilt clock is ticking. Better go.

Your Daughter? That's My Worst Nightmare

If only I could write like Hilary Mantel - whose wrenching, angry, memoir Giving Up the Ghost made me laugh out loud, or snort and snuffle into the lounge to the surprise of both Abe and Clancy. Because she's intelligent, because she's a good researcher, because she's articulate, doctors spent a lot of time being surprised by her and, because it's the late 1960s and early 1970s, they pathologise her rigour and turn it into psychosis. One doctor tells her she's conscienscious, with a mind for detail, in a mildly accusatory way. She was studying law, and so goes on to say, "I tried to imagine the other kind of law student, the kind who favoured the broad-brush approach, who took on the law of trusts, for example, with a grand generalist's sweep and dash." Well, it made me laugh.

I also loved this, when being treated appallingly by dickhead lecturers at university, who couldn't see why a woman should be studying law at all: "Some people have forgetten, or never known, why we needed the feminist movement so badly. This was why: so that some talentless prat in a nylon shirt couldn't patronise you, while around you the spotty boys smirked and giggled, trying to worm into his favour . . . It was assumed that marriage was the beginning of a woman's affective life, and the end of her mental life." (pp 160-161) And goes on to describe how, in job interviews, you were grilled about marriage, intentions, when you were going to "start a family", by "some grizzled ringmaster, shifty and semi-embarrassed as he asked a girl half his age to tell him about her sex life and account for her next ovulation." But really, it's  one of the best descriptions of pain and illness and misdiagnosis I've ever read. I had thought that both Joan Didion and Susan Sontag, even David Rieff, talked about illness and hospitals and the medical system well but, really, Mantel takes the cake by describing this ostensibly sweet self who was raging and railing and almost screaming with frustration inside a body that was going out of control. But then again, maybe I only think that because I finished reading it in the last few days, so it has inhabited my imagination.

That, and Colum McCann's Let the Great World Spin - vibrant, clever, convoluted, sad, utterly gripping. In some ways, a novel about grief (I wept through one entire chapter; then was buoyed up the hard edge and street rhythm of the next, which left me surprised at the left-over sniffling); in others it has the euphoric poetry of Philippe Pettit's tightrope walk between the Twin Towers balanced over everything, turning your eyes and the character's eyes up and up. Then some cringeworthy moments of race politics where you can hardly look at the page. Still, it helps to have seen the doco Man on Wire, about that tightrope walk, to give you Pettit's arrogance and his poetic hopes, given that he walks in and out of the novel. Must go and find some more words by McCann, because this Irish-American storytelling was really something.

And on the whole entertainment thing, I've also managed to see two films (ta-da) and start a few other novels. Saw Jane Campion's Bright Star which was so beautifully framed and gorgeous to look at, and wasn't Abby Cornish fabulous, sweetie? And the opening scene, full of laundry and washing lines, like elegant birds in the landscape, made it a very domesticated, women's film, without being a conventional Chick Flick (which is a dopey term, but hey). For a story about a relationship with a male poet, it was so covered in cloth and held together by handstitching, with views below stairs and in the kitchen, so that the work of capital-R romance was on display. No "Elven Grot" for Keats' rather more earthy Lady of Shallot, rather a house that had to be rented and walls that were a little thin. Given that nothing much happened, it still held me . . . and of course, wept through the last bit, and emerged from the cinema with mad hair and a red nose, in the middle of a hot sunny day, and had to slink down the street without a tissue, feeling rather tenderised.

And then saw Avatar in 3D (on the "now for something completely different" stakes). It was so completely and utterly "filmic": a huge spectacle, roaring over your head and leaping right into your face. And yes, some ooga-booga spirituality and none-too-subtle colonialism versus the pure indigenous hearts and minds. But what a beautifully imagined world, with lovely detail. Am still wondering, though, what to make of the soldier with a disability at the centre of it: there he is, being self-sufficient and capable, and seems to have enough ramps and access points to get around in; yes, we see him being discriminated against by some macho marine pratts, but he doesn't give a shit; and the promise is held out to him that, if he could afford it, he could get working legs back again. So, is this the future? And then there's the project he's working on, where he has a "conventional/ unconventional" body by inhabiting this alien avatar. He first disappears into this pod, this terrible claustrophobic space that keeps him still and make him terribly vulnerable (exposing both him, and a central plot problem; that, and what happens when his alien self is asleep. Lucky there weren't any little alien babies nearby or he would have been in big trouble for sleeping through). His broken/ disabled body is left behind; he stands up and walks and runs and exalts in the physicality of his new alien body, that can not only stand up, it can leap, almost fly. He's remembering old sensations. Get up out of your wheelchair, my child, and walk. What if he'd been a kid who never could walk, who had to learn afresh: would he have enjoyed it as much? Must the disabled body always be positioned as something that's "wrong", so that even living virtually, while isolated in a pod, where "at least" he can walk is better than living in a new way in his own body. With all that military technology, you'd think he could have a pretty fine chair. I really want to know what the properly thought through disability activists and theorists think of this one. I don't really know what to think. A few links here, including a man who says hey, we don't all necessarily long to be "fixed".

But here's the link back to a non-alien, non-green-and-scaley skinned ordinary life. What if the person in the wheelchair is imagined not as a person - or a child - but rather as the worst possible scenario, the "nightmare"?

We live next door to a very nice, very social, couple. Two women who talk and laugh loudly, and know how to throw a generous party, with a bottle of champagne or 50, and everyone invited. So just before Christmas, I wandered over, leaving Abe (who wasn't in the mood) at home with the babes. There were lots of people who I'd seen in the street but not properly met. Often glimpsed as we all head off to work, or wrestle stuff into cars, or chase dogs down the street, or do 85 point turns (me) in a very narrow street with bugger-all parking. A young couple were there, pregnant with their first child. Young Professionals, who I didn't find wildly interesting, but I threw back too many glasses of sharp cold white wine and became all wide-eyed and overly-enthusiastic about everything (sigh, must grow out of that). So we talked about the baby, and the guy said things about how they were having one who'd be all dressed in frills and pink, making me grind my teeth with irritation, but really - perfectly nice, all very bland and middle class, everyone well educated and had read the right books on pregnancy and health. I'm not into giving out unwanted advice, or pretending I know how to do things. I did say they should yell if feeling overwhelmed, just on the basis that the snot/ green baby shit/ weird behavious might be reassuringly familiar.

So we talked about pregnancy, and health, and labour, and I did say that yes, with Miz M, it was a healthy pregnancy, full term baby, no known problems, and yet yes the mysterious, severe, disability happened anyway, and here's our lovely girl, likely to never walk or sit, may or may not ever talk, will need us forever.

Disability.

"That's my worst nightmare", he said. I was a little bit pissed so didn't get at all offended or upset, and just did my usual, "Oh well, you just cope with what you cope with, don't you" routine. But really, my daughter is your worst nightmare? Full marks on the subtlety stakes, I say.

And it had been a week of it. Not long before that, Abe and I had actually managed An Event without children. We organised a babysitter, and went out to a Christmas drinks thing for Abe's work, full of medicos and scientists and heirarchies like I'm not at all used to. Standing around on a lovely verandah with a view over the city and (again) very nice wine, and met some interesting and not so interesting people. A fabulous young woman who was a paediatrician and very funny, who pointed out a very senior guy she worked with, and that she'd always thought he looked as though he should be wearing a puffy shirt and being one of the three musketeers. It was D'Artagnan at thirty paces from then on. A man who ran a branch of an airline, but clearly didn't read the papers, which was odd. And a woman who told me she was a physiotherapists before she retired, and worked with people with disabilities. "Physios are terrific," I said, startling her with my conviction. So I had to explain why, and told her about Miz M's work with therapists . . . and then, in another act of great subtlety, she told me how her children used to be mortified when she'd be out with them and she'd see a client and go to say hello. "Mum", her kids would say, "why do you always have to go talk to the people in wheelchairs with pasta stuck to their foreheads". Oh ho ho ho and Merry Christmas to you, too, good to see there's a laugh to be had there too . . .

Wheelchairs on TV - and other representational bits and pieces

I've spent years attuned to the way women and girls are represented in popular culture - decoding it and recoding it, approving or being outraged, reading and watching and responding. But like the freshly converted, am astonished at what  I'm seeing,  that I've found with this newly acquired quivering antena in relation to disability and popular culture. (Cut away to the eye rolling from people who've been thinking about this for decades - and yes, fair enough.) It's not that I was entirely clueless before, but the urgency increases when it's your girl who's one of the "crippled kiddies", whose image is most often seen in news stories about charity and "gratefuness", in subplots about pity, in asides about hardship, as shorthand for difficult lives, or in tabloid newscaff programs as a way to represent a split or problem or crisis in a relationship.

And then there's the "good" stuff.

I've learnt to whip my head around and pay attention when I notice a fluffy critter in a children's show who's propelling themselves along in a wheelchair. To wonder what Miz M will think when she's old enough to notice, that there's a song-and-dance routine in wheelchairs on Glee; to hope that the irreverance in Malcolm in the Middle might continue. To be pleased at the way the woman in the BBC show about the choir is an attractice, feisty, character with a platinum bob and a tendency to be hilariously blunt FIRST, and a Little Person second, that's in All the Small Things. Wondering if the new drama, Cast-Offs, on BBC 4 will make it to Oz, given that the six leads happen to have a disability, rather than it being about disability. To seek out children's books that deal with disability, like "Rolling Along with Goldilocks and the Three Bears", which is currently one-year-old Clancy's favourite. To talk to a friend whose a children's book author about whether and how disability might be inlcuded, withOUT a preachy, didactic, moralistic tone to the book. Finding a whole project about this in the UK, "putting disabled children in the picture", complete with illustrations ready to be used.

Discovering that there's a whole program on the BBC that uses Makaton signing and is not only about disability, but also acknowledges communication and developmental delay. Something Special.

Begin to seek out dancers and performers with a difference; to see their performances online.

Wonder what it means that Sam Worthington plays a soldier with a disability in Avatar. What exactly is going on that he then "escapes" his disability, and is re-embodied in a colonial type myth and a functioning, alien body? (Really have no idea what to think about that one, although it does make me remember a great blog I read from a woman who found the use of Wii-fit liberating, as it allowed her to "play" sport, to use her body's strength in ways she found fun and inclusive.) But cyborgs and avatars? Is that about embracing bodily difference, or wanting to "fix" it? I bet other people who actually know stuff have talked that one through, and I'm not just thinking Donna Haraway either.

And then am pulled up by realising how much I hadn't thought through, how complex the issues are, and that "representation" in and of itself may not be everything. Read an opinion piece arguing that actors with disabilities should be used to play characters with disabilities, written by the v interesting writer Lennard Davis. Although, as often happens in these debates, the vitriol behind some of the responses isn't that attractive.

So, it gets back to the old questions of what, and whether, and how, and controlled by whom, do images or stories "just like me" mean. Which, when I put it in such a convoluted way, doesn't look like anybody's "old question" at all. Hmmmm.