I've spent years attuned to the way women and girls are represented in popular culture - decoding it and recoding it, approving or being outraged, reading and watching and responding. But like the freshly converted, am astonished at what I'm seeing, that I've found with this newly acquired quivering antena in relation to disability and popular culture. (Cut away to the eye rolling from people who've been thinking about this for decades - and yes, fair enough.) It's not that I was entirely clueless before, but the urgency increases when it's your girl who's one of the "crippled kiddies", whose image is most often seen in news stories about charity and "gratefuness", in subplots about pity, in asides about hardship, as shorthand for difficult lives, or in tabloid newscaff programs as a way to represent a split or problem or crisis in a relationship.
And then there's the "good" stuff.
I've learnt to whip my head around and pay attention when I notice a fluffy critter in a children's show who's propelling themselves along in a wheelchair. To wonder what Miz M will think when she's old enough to notice, that there's a song-and-dance routine in wheelchairs on Glee; to hope that the irreverance in Malcolm in the Middle might continue. To be pleased at the way the woman in the BBC show about the choir is an attractice, feisty, character with a platinum bob and a tendency to be hilariously blunt FIRST, and a Little Person second, that's in All the Small Things. Wondering if the new drama, Cast-Offs, on BBC 4 will make it to Oz, given that the six leads happen to have a disability, rather than it being about disability. To seek out children's books that deal with disability, like "Rolling Along with Goldilocks and the Three Bears", which is currently one-year-old Clancy's favourite. To talk to a friend whose a children's book author about whether and how disability might be inlcuded, withOUT a preachy, didactic, moralistic tone to the book. Finding a whole project about this in the UK, "putting disabled children in the picture", complete with illustrations ready to be used.
Discovering that there's a whole program on the BBC that uses Makaton signing and is not only about disability, but also acknowledges communication and developmental delay. Something Special.
Begin to seek out dancers and performers with a difference; to see their performances online.
Wonder what it means that Sam Worthington plays a soldier with a disability in Avatar. What exactly is going on that he then "escapes" his disability, and is re-embodied in a colonial type myth and a functioning, alien body? (Really have no idea what to think about that one, although it does make me remember a great blog I read from a woman who found the use of Wii-fit liberating, as it allowed her to "play" sport, to use her body's strength in ways she found fun and inclusive.) But cyborgs and avatars? Is that about embracing bodily difference, or wanting to "fix" it? I bet other people who actually know stuff have talked that one through, and I'm not just thinking Donna Haraway either.
And then am pulled up by realising how much I hadn't thought through, how complex the issues are, and that "representation" in and of itself may not be everything. Read an opinion piece arguing that actors with disabilities should be used to play characters with disabilities, written by the v interesting writer Lennard Davis. Although, as often happens in these debates, the vitriol behind some of the responses isn't that attractive.
So, it gets back to the old questions of what, and whether, and how, and controlled by whom, do images or stories "just like me" mean. Which, when I put it in such a convoluted way, doesn't look like anybody's "old question" at all. Hmmmm.